Trump’s Proposed Gaza “Board of Peace” Faces Growing Skepticism from Allies Ahead of Davos
Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to establish a Gaza-focused “Board of Peace” is drawing mounting skepticism from key U.S. allies, just days before the initiative is expected to be discussed on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos.
According to diplomats familiar with the discussions, the proposed body would aim to oversee post-conflict stabilization efforts in Gaza, bringing together regional stakeholders, international donors, and private-sector representatives. Trump allies describe the plan as a bold alternative to traditional diplomacy, positioning it as a framework to rebuild infrastructure and reduce long-term conflict risks.
However, European and Middle Eastern partners have expressed reservations about both the structure and intent of the proposal. Several officials questioned the lack of consultation with existing international mechanisms, including the United Nations and the Quartet on the Middle East, warning that parallel initiatives could complicate already fragile diplomatic efforts.
“There is concern this could dilute coordinated peace efforts rather than strengthen them,” said a senior European diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity. “Any initiative involving Gaza requires broad regional buy-in and clarity on governance.”
The timing of the proposal has also raised eyebrows. With global leaders and corporate executives gathering in Davos, critics argue the announcement risks appearing more symbolic than substantive. Some allies worry the plan could be used as a political platform rather than a viable peace mechanism.
Israel has not formally endorsed the idea, while Palestinian representatives have voiced skepticism, citing unresolved issues surrounding sovereignty, security, and humanitarian access. Arab states involved in previous mediation efforts are reportedly seeking more details before offering support.
Supporters of the initiative counter that traditional approaches have failed to deliver lasting peace. “Fresh thinking is needed,” said a former Trump administration official. “The Board of Peace concept is about economic stability as a foundation for security.”
Analysts say the mixed response reflects broader uncertainty over U.S. leadership in Middle East diplomacy. “Without clear mandates and international legitimacy, new frameworks face an uphill battle,” noted a regional affairs expert.
As discussions loom in Davos, the fate of Trump’s Gaza “Board of Peace” remains uncertain, highlighting the challenges of reshaping diplomacy in one of the world’s most complex conflict zones.
For more such articles, please follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram.
